#OWS: The “99%” is more fractured than we would care to admit

(crossposted at ABLC)

I couldn’t go to #OccupyMobile. I wanted to, very much, but I was in the hospital. While everyone was taking over parks, setting up tents and camping out in protest of income inequality, I was nearly wasted away in constant pain in a sanitized bed in a room where everything smelled sterile, drowned in antiseptic. Were I able to attend, anyway, it wouldn’t have been for very long – I am in a wheelchair and camping out in a park, getting out of my chair, sleeping on the ground in a cold and dirty tent, even if I could have gone I couldn’t have stayed – I couldn’t have been a part of this. The privilege of being able to forgo thinking about your health, where you might find a place to sleep or even some flat ground to wheel across is a privilege to which I’ve never had access. From the outset I was stuck “participating” in the movement – since I do believe in a lot of its underlying goals – by going online and reading or writing about it.

For a movement that rests on visibility at parks or other open areas, this isn’t much of a way to participate and to feel welcomed.

It’s bigger than ableism, though.

How many black Occupiers have there been? Not too many. We have a so-called justice system in this country that was formulated at the same time our forebears were beginning to dabble in slavery. This system has for centuries worked to arrest and detain blacks and keep them in prison throughout much of their lives. Three strikes laws and the “War on Drugs” have made it necessary for black people to consider every thing they do very carefully so that they don’t upset the ugly institutions the country was built upon and end up in jail one too many times, or under the batons of some angry white cops; even in so-called liberal cities police violence has always been rampant and extensive. Racial violence and fears run deep.

This necessitates many potential Occupiers who care about issues of income inequality staying home, away from violence and arrests. An arrest of a black person does not have the same consequences that an arrest of a white person has, and that is a problem that deserves wider attention if we are ever going to discuss real equality in this country. So many Occupiers were so happy to be arrested, so proud of ‘taking on the system’ because getting arrested isn’t as bad for a majority of Americans. I wish people could see how that is not taking on any system at all, but is instead exercising a level of privilege to make a smaller point on a vague issue that is divorced from other issues and should not be.

How can we discuss “income inequality” but not racism, sexism, homophobia, biphobia or transphobia?

A friend of mine once argued with someone about issues facing people who are both black and gay, and he was told that “gay trumps race any day.” It sometimes feels that this type of thinking goes on in this country, and that it’s going on in OWS, even as they are trying to fight some of the problems facing both gay and black people, and those who live in both of those worlds. It feels like people think “class trumps race/gender/homophobia/biphobia/transphobia.” It doesn’t. It’s impossible to take on those things one-by-one, just separating each out in a clean and accessible way.

There is a depth to the problems in this country that many are missing – and this is happening among our liberal and progressive friends.

In a lot of ways we are not “the 99%,” because we are the 12% of blacks, the 72% of whites, the 16% of latino/as. We’re the 1.7% of gays 18 years old or older.

We’re separated by bigger institutional issues that have been around for centuries, since at least the 1600s. And we are not discussing them. They’re not seen as a part of the Occupy movement, only a separate issue to be worked out once there is “income equality'” and people have jobs and the economy is great again.

There is no mention of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act or the fact that in 34 states, people are being fired-at-will because of their gender identity. In 29 states, people can legally be fired for their sexual orientation. What about jobs for them? What about their “income inequality”? There is no mention of any way at all to prevent joblessness and income inequality for our community.

It is the same for disabled people even with laws that are designed to prevent employment discrimination: they just come up with new and different ways to not hire us or to fire us for not having the ability to be in two places at once or to do a lot of tasks that involve standing. This shows that these issues are far bigger than laws or biases but are part of a bigger institutional system of injustice aimed at keeping people white and heterosexual and cisgender.

Women continue to make less money than men.

And what about police violence, or crime measures? The 0ccupiers are getting arrested and seeing police violence and getting a taste of the life of an average black person – or at least the daily fears that this life may become something that they deal with at any given moment – and the occupiers are still not discussing ways to end anti-black police violence, or violence in general.

When I started reading the reports of the violence against transgender occupiers, that’s when I knew that the thinking behind this movement might not be as spot-on as some say that it is.

A problem with building a real “99%” movement – one of the biggest problems – is that we all have so many personal biases. We all engage in stereotypical thinking and I include myself in this on purpose – I may be gay and disabled, but living in Alabama, whiteness is so “important” that it makes me privileged, regardless of the other parts of me. The face-to-face, personal racism/homophobia/transphobia that we are dealing with can be staggering. It’s incredibly difficult to get people to confront issues like anti-black police violence or criminal injustices when so many whites just don’t like black people.

We saw it with Proposition 8 in California.

That was blamed on the black community with such rapidity that it immediately brings to mind the fact that we are all a fractured society. We were “trying to build a movement” then, too, to fight homophobic laws. The fact that we in the LGBT community would not just blame that on a single minority with one distinctive feature – and I’m not getting into whether “race” is even a real thing in this piece because it is getting long enough already – but that we would “go there” so quickly really frightened me from almost the moment it happened.

Those of us who know that blaming race is not an accurate story are still fighting against the myth even today, in 2011.

That is but one example of the bigotry of every community, the unconscious, or even sometimes conscious, biases we all deal with that prevent us all from truly coming together and really being “the 99%” Until we do that, and until we fight “income inequality” alongside some of the bigger issues that are institutional, we won’t have justice or equality. We can be the 99%, but we are not there yet.

About Scottie Thomaston

I am a writer and an activist for the rights of the queer community, the disabled community, and those in the criminal justice community. View all posts by Scottie Thomaston

12 responses to “#OWS: The “99%” is more fractured than we would care to admit

  • Richard Lyon

    When the Occupy Movement first began I had hopes of it bridging some of the divides that separate various people who inhibit the 99% and keeps us from exerting pressure for human equality. Unfortunately I am becoming ever more pessimistic about it. The campers are so locked into doing things exactly their way that it leaves little room to build alliances.

  • Scottie Thomaston aka indiemcemopants

    Exactly, it’s hard NOT to get excited about something called “the 99%”. The name implies we’re all gonna come together and be awesome to each other.

    We could still do that but we need to confront a bunch of issues first.

  • Rog (@rogerjab)

    Who made you the voice of what Occupy stands for? I suppose getting your skull fractured while fighting for rights is alevel of priviledge too? So much nonsense here.

  • Scottie Thomaston aka indiemcemopants

    Actually no one ever said I was “the voice” of it.

    And yes, the ability to go get arrested and face a slap on the wrist instead of 25 years is privilege

  • Lysana

    Overall, I adore this piece to pieces. I would ask two things of you in this, though.

    First, please do not erase biphobia. The problems faced by bisexuals are specific, definite, and in many ways independent of homophobia. This is especially due to our being erased and ignored by gays and lesbians. A recent study of the San Francisco bi community found we are twice as likely to be poor and victimized by domestic violence. We are also twice as large as the gay community while our concerns remain grossly under-served. That which helps monosexual queers does not fully serve bisexuals.

    Second, please don’t turn cisgender/transgender into past-tense verbs. Grammar pedantry moment, I realize, but many of our trans brothers and sisters prefer to keep the word as an adjective where it belongs.

  • J. Moore

    Like many things in our history….we’ve put band-aids on wounds that required so much more…I grew up with people rioting in my city because of church bombings and the killing of a civil rights leader….demonstrations against an unwanted war in Vietnam and the multitudes of our young men lost there….the hatred and cruelity towards a group of human beings because of their desire not to live in the shadows anymore and a disease called Aids…How stupid we were to think that any of the problems had really been “fixed”…

    The past few decades, I have seen and been a guilty part of those who stepped back and stopped speaking up or even paying attention…too wrapped up in what became a “Me-Me” shelfishness expecting the country’s problems would be taken care of somehow and someone like me couldn’t make a difference anyway…

    But I was wrong and so are those who think that by giving some of the problems a more verbal,visual platform and letting the anger of a people vent that everything will get better….not true…We’ve got to stop using band-aids and deal with the fact that no one is healed unless we all are healed…

    We need people like you that point out the facts and bring the harsher realities out in the light for all to see… that it’s not a true 99% yet.

  • Keori

    Yes, yes, and YES. One of the wonderful things about being involved in Occupy Boston, and interfacing w/ folks in Occupy The Hood, is being able to talk in a (moreso than before) respectful space about the racial disparities at OB, and issues facing POC, specifically black Muslim men in this city.

    I haven’t told you lately, having taken indefinite hiatus from DK, but I love you, Scottie. Hope to see you at NN12 and hug you at last.

    • Scottie Thomaston aka indiemcemopants

      I love you too, and am sorry you’re away from there. But I understand why someone might take a break from that place. šŸ™‚

      I’ve still not been able to attend an event myself but I’ve read at least 5 pieces of writing about the race issues to take it seriously. When so many people are saying that this is how they see it, they should get listened to.

  • Caerie

    Are you still in Alabama?

    I ask because the purposes that Occupy works towards are not universal, as much as we might hope for them to be. The premise of Occupy, for good or bad, is to actually use your voice, instead of remaining quiet, because participation is the biggest key.

    That’s why we use consensus taking for our general assemblies. High, super-majority percentages of people. Occupy bands together against a specific demand, encompassing only the others which it can reach out to without diminishing its initial push.

    In places like NYC, their general assembly comes out against discrimination quite clearly, but to claim that Occupy isn’t doing enough against specific points of bigotry seems a tad silly. They admit that they are problems, but most signs will reflect the initial reason the protesters gathered, the most unifying vision they have.

    And you’re right in that they haven’t put forth a demand for laws protecting transgendered people from being fired at-will (A subject near and dear to my heart), but they haven’t really put forth a demand for anything. The signs they hold up are what attention gets drawn towards. Honestly, I think they’re doing a wonderful job trying to get people to use their voice at all. Maybe the next pride parades can be a little more politically vocal, or after Occupy has solidified itself a little more, maybe they can talk.

    Universal acceptance is possible, and would be wonderful. But to be honest, it’s unpopular, still. For that matter, Occupy hasn’t exactly been having a field day in the press. But OWS has encompassed the principles of equality, and freedom for discrimination. In New York, you saw OWS marching against Stop and Frisk early in their protest.

    But we’re having a hard enough time evoking compassion from a white-cis-straight-loving population as it is, just protesting in order to get remedies that are in their best interest. If we can manage to get our foot in the door there, if we can lay foundation for our population to be actually heard, and not silenced, slandered, and violently dispersed, I think that’s when the movement will blossom into true social justice.

    Hopefully, this awakening will take months or years, instead of generations. But maybe if OWS manages to fix our class issue a little, everyone else will have the time to speak up about what matters to them, and legal ground to stand on that will stand strong in the face of discriminatory repression.

Leave a comment